Thursday, May 7, 2015
Friday, April 17, 2015
EXPOSING THE FACE IN THE AGE OF MEMES
EXPOSING THE FACE IN THE AGE OF MEMES
(or do you really need to use a
photograph to drive a point)
17 April 2015
“As a visual artist, one cannot run
away from storytelling.” That statement was part of the exhibition
notes/curatorial statement I wrote for my seventh one-man exhibition titled
Dramatis Personae held at the Baguio Museum in January 2014. In the said
exhibition, I mounted a series of paintings which I assembled as a cast of
characters as each character becomes the storyteller by themselves. I focused
on the face as the main platform of the exhibition because I believe that the face
is a dominant and influential instrument of interaction and communication.
So much faces were used as models by artists of the
past and the present. The most prominent remains to be that of Mona Lisa by
Leonardo da Vinci. Yet know ones know the real person behind the face of the
Mona Lisa even until da Vinci’s death. It took centuries to learn that it was
that of Lisa of Gioconda. Rembrandt, the Dutch master, became very notable with
his portraiture. To trim down a list of masters who used faces as subjects would
be hard but that would include Van Dyke, Sir Henry Raeburn, Ingres, J. L.
Davis, William McGregor Paxton and William Adolpe Bouguereau. Carravagio
painted the much-talked about Girl with the Pearl Earring. Who owns the face of
the girl? It was Carravagio’s “housemaid.” So popular was the painting that a
cinematic rendition with the same title was released and Scarlet Johansson played
the part. Time and again artists would attempt to paint a rendition of the face
of Jesus although his face was never really recorded.
Wednesday, April 15, 2015
THE SUBSTANCE OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 1
THE SUBSTANCE OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 1
15 April 2015
Statement of the Problem.
What is wrong with Executive Order No.
1?
Know the facts.
At the onset, three things must be
clearly understood. First, the 2001 Revised Constitution of the University of the
East Studentry is defective and is in urgent need of amending. It is the reason
why Kapit-Bisig ng Mag-aaral sa Pamantasan ng Silangan (KAMPS), otherwise known
as Kapit-Bisig, started to actively initiate the call to amend. Second, the
current 2001 Constitution which superceded the 1987 Studentry Constitution was
clearly patterned after the Kapit-Bisig ng Party Alliance Constitution (KBPA)
of the late 80s. Nobody uses the phase “nationalist, scientific and
mass-oriented system of education” during that time except those who have been
branded as “activists and militants.” Third, the first student council
constitution was approved in a plebiscite by the studentry in 10 August 1983,
Wednesday, under the term of Kapit-Bisig standard bearer and now Congressman
Ben Evardone (see DAWN, Vol. XVII No. 6). That success can only be claimed by the
Alyansa ng Mag-aaral sa Pamantasan ng Silangan (AMPS) and the Kapit-Bisig ng
Mag-aaral at Sambayanan which is the original name of Kapit-Bisig. Both
organizations became the backbone of the present UE Kapit-Bisig Alumni
Association Inc.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)